Corey Robinson v. T. Clark ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-7019
    COREY JAWAN ROBINSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CAPTAIN T. CLARK; MS. D. BAILEY, Classification; LIEUTENANT
    J. WILLIAMS; OFFICER MOSHER; LOLITA M. LEE; SHERISSE D.
    BIRCH; LORETTA AIKEN; WARDEN WAYNE MCCABE; IGC B. J. THOMAS;
    OFFICER J. MIDDLETON; OFFFICER JEREMY JOHNSON; NURSE LUANNE
    MAUNEY; NURSE J. SCOTT; ANN HALLMAN; OFFICER TABITHA FORD;
    MS. S. JONES; MAJOR THIERRY NETTLES; ASSOCIATE WARDEN FRED
    THOMPSON; WILLIAM BRIGHTHARP; CAPTAIN ANN SHEPPARD,
    Defendants – Appellees,
    and
    SERGEANT   J.    ARANDA;      SOUTH   CAROLINA   DEPARTMENT   OF
    CORRECTIONS,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Orangeburg.     J. Michelle Childs, District
    Judge. (5:12-cv-00502-JMC)
    Submitted:   October 17, 2013               Decided: October 21, 2013
    Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Corey Jawan Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.      Elloree Ann Ganes,
    Thomas Happel Scurry, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina;
    Michael Charles Tanner, MICHAEL C. TANNER LAW OFFICE, Bamberg,
    South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Corey    Jawan      Robinson       appeals      the    district    court’s
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    denying relief on his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2006) complaint.                                We
    have     reviewed       the     record     and      find       no    reversible    error.
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court.         Robinson       v.    Clark,        No.   5:12-cv-00502-JMC         (D.S.C.
    June 18,    2013).        We    dispense      with      oral    argument    because     the
    facts    and    legal    contentions       are      adequately       presented     in   the
    materials      before    this      court     and    argument        would   not   aid   the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-7019

Filed Date: 10/21/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021