Ajay Singh v. Loretta Lynch ( 2016 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2464
AJAY KUMAR SINGH,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney; CALVIN MCCORMICK,
Director, Immigration & Customs Enforcement,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: May 20, 2016 Decided: June 30, 2016
Before KING, GREGORY, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John E. Gallagher, Catonsville, Maryland, for Petitioner.
Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General,
Anthony W. Norwood, Christina P. Greer, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ajay Kumar Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s
denial of his requests for asylum and withholding of removal.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the
record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the
agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012),
and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision,
INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly,
we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the
Board. See In re: Singh (B.I.A. Oct. 22, 2015). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2