United States v. Jamal Alfred ( 2016 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7163
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JAMAL H. ALFRED, a/k/a Joshua Al Hall, a/k/a JA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:03-cr-00017-GCM-1)
Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: December 22, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamal H. Alfred, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas A. O’Malley, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jamal H. Alfred appeals from the district court’s order
granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. * We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Alfred,
No. 3:03-cr-00017-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 2015). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court granted Alfred’s § 3582(c)(2)
motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce
Alfred’s sentence to the full extent he requested.
2