United States v. Smith , 117 F. App'x 882 ( 2004 )

PER CURIAM.

Davin Lamont Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Smith, No. CR-02-17-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.