United States v. Thomas ( 2011 )

PER CURIAM:

Lyndell Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to dismiss the indictment and for production of documents. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas, No. 3:93-cr-00058-BR-3, 2010 WL 4316755 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.