Francis v. Woody ( 2011 )

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Romaine Francis appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Appellees on his various 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Francis v. Woody, No. 3:09-cv-00235-REP, 2011 WL 2693206 (ED.Va. July 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.