United States v. Eckles , 500 F. App'x 260 ( 2012 )

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Larnell Eckles, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(C)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction.^* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Eckles, No. 5:00-cr-00046-RLV-4 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

* Although the district court granted Eckles’s motion, Eckles contends on appeal that he was entitled to an even further reduction.