United States v. Carr ( 2013 )

PER CURIAM:

Steven Donewan Carr appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction.^* Because the district court lacked the authority to reconsider its disposition of Carr’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010), we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. See United States v. Carr, No. 5:98-cr-00246-RLV-2 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

* Although the district court granted Carr’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Carr’s sentence to the full extent he requested.