Hapi v. Holder ( 2013 )

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sidonie Leubeu Hapi, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2012). We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Leubeu Hapi (B.I.A. Oct. 15, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.