Muhammad v. Purdue ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:

    Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Purdue, No. 5:12-cv-00129-FPS-JSK, 2013 WL 4508870 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 13-7453

Judges: Keenan, Motz, Thacker

Filed Date: 1/24/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024