United States v. Williams , 157 F. App'x 616 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM:

    Thomas Williams, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and denying a subsequent motion to alter or amend the judgment. These orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, *617529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 05-7166

Citation Numbers: 157 F. App'x 616

Judges: Gregory, Motz, Traxler

Filed Date: 12/7/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024