Hairston v. Walker , 280 F. App'x 300 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM:

    Irene F. Hairston, Peggy M.H. Robins, and Deloris A. McKnight appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint and denying their motion for reconsideration, Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We *301have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hairston v. Walker, No. 1:06-cv-00102-NCT-WWD, 2007 WL 2112245 (M.D.N.C. July 19, 2007) & (Oct. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 08-1005

Citation Numbers: 280 F. App'x 300

Filed Date: 6/4/2008

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024