Ganzie v. Ponton ( 2015 )

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marcus Ganzie appeals the district court’s judgment granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil rights complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ganzie v. Warden Ponton, No. 2:14-cv-00350-RBS-DEM (E.D.Va., May 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.