Keeler v. Chang , 624 F. App'x 113 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • *114Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:

    Hieda A. Keeler appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Keeler’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Keeler has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the. district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 15-2070

Citation Numbers: 624 F. App'x 113

Judges: Davis, Floyd, Gregory

Filed Date: 12/17/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024