United States v. Speight ( 2016 )

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Daniel Speight appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Speight, No. 1:10-cr-00426-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. July 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED