-
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this eircpit.
PER CURIAM: Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation, dismissing Odom’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012), and imposing a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in formal pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. South Carolina, No. 5:16-cv-02674-RMG (D.S.C.
*207 Sept. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.DISMISSED
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 16-2121
Citation Numbers: 676 F. App'x 206
Judges: Hamilton, Niemeyer, Traxler
Filed Date: 2/16/2017
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024