-
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Bernard McFadden appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment, Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McFadden v. Bittinger, No. 2:15-cv-02507-JMC, 2017 WL 1044845 (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 2017 & May 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 17-6772
Citation Numbers: 699 F. App'x 206
Judges: Floyd, Hamilton, Harris
Filed Date: 10/20/2017
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024