Awung v. Holder ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 10-1134
    WILFRED JINGWA AWUNG,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:   December 10, 2010              Decided:   January 11, 2011
    Before MOTZ and    KING,   Circuit   Judges,    and    HAMILTON,   Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Danielle Beach-Oswald, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOCIATES,
    PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant
    Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Erica B.
    Miles,   Office   of   Immigration  Litigation,   UNITED  STATES
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Wilfred     Jingwa      Awung,            a        native    and      citizen       of
    Cameroon,   petitions       for    review       of        an    order    of    the    Board     of
    Immigration    Appeals      (Board)     dismissing                his    appeal       from    the
    Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for relief from
    removal.
    Awung challenges the Board’s conclusion that he failed
    to   qualify   for     withholding      of        removal.               “To     qualify       for
    withholding of removal, a petitioner must show that he faces a
    clear probability of persecution because of his race, religion,
    nationality,       membership      in   a       particular              social       group,    or
    political opinion.”         Rusu v. INS, 
    296 F.3d 316
    , 324 n.13 (4th
    Cir. 2002) (citing INS v. Stevic, 
    467 U.S. 407
    , 430 (1984)).                                    We
    have reviewed the record and Awung’s contentions and conclude
    that substantial evidence supports the finding below that Awung
    did not meet his burden to qualify for this relief.
    Accordingly,      we    deny        the       petition       for     review.        We
    dispense    with     oral    argument       because              the     facts       and     legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-1134

Judges: Motz, King, Hamilton

Filed Date: 1/11/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024