United States v. Muhammad , 404 F. App'x 812 ( 2010 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6052
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PETE NOBLE MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Pete Smith, a/k/a Jose,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,
Jr., District Judge. (2:93-cr-00117-WO-1)
Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 6, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pete Noble Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Anna Mills Wagoner,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Pete Noble Muhammad seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying various motions Muhammad had filed
regarding his term of supervised release. In denying Muhammad
relief, the district court noted that the issues raised in
Muhammad’s motions would be addressed during the course of his
then-pending supervised release revocation proceedings. This
court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders. 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen
v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
The order Muhammad seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor
an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly,
we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2