Zhi Liu v. Eric Holder, Jr. ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-1019
    ZHI QIANG LIU,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:   September 11, 2014          Decided:   September 16, 2014
    Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Michael Brown, LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL BROWN, New York, New York,
    for Petitioner.   Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General,
    Shelley R. Goad, Assistant Director, John D. Williams, Office of
    Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
    Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Zhi Qiang Liu, a native and citizen of the People’s
    Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board
    of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the
    immigration       judge’s      denial    of       his     requests    for    asylum     and
    withholding of deportation. *              We have thoroughly reviewed the
    record, including the transcript of Liu’s merits hearing and all
    supporting evidence.            We conclude that the record evidence does
    not   compel      a   ruling    contrary          to    any   of    the    administrative
    factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that
    substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.                           See INS v.
    Elias–Zacarias, 
    502 U.S. 478
    , 481 (1992).
    Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
    reasons stated by the Board.              See In re: Zhi Qiang Liu (B.I.A.
    Dec. 16, 2013).           We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts     and    legal   contentions      are          adequately    presented     in   the
    materials       before   this    court    and          argument    would    not   aid   the
    decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    *
    To the extent that Liu seeks to challenge the immigration
    judge’s denial of his request for protection under the
    Convention Against Torture, we lack jurisdiction on the ground
    that Liu failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before
    the Board. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2012); Massis v. Mukasey,
    
    549 F.3d 631
    , 638–40 (4th Cir. 2008).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-1019

Judges: Motz, Agee, Davis

Filed Date: 9/16/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024