James Roudabush, Jr. v. Milano , 590 F. App'x 249 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-7668
    JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MILANO, Captain; LT. M. JOSIAH; SGT. F. MENSAH; LT. REA;
    ANDERSON; D/S H. MONIR; D. HALL; C. M. HILTON; JANE DOE,
    Nurse; CHARLIE, Paramedic at ADC,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    FOX,
    Defendant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.    Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
    District Judge. (2:13-cv-00581-RBS-TEM)
    Submitted:   January 6, 2015                 Decided:   January 16, 2015
    Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    James Lester Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.       Broderick
    Coleman Dunn, Alexander Francuzenko, COOK CRAIG & FRANCUZENKO,
    PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    James    Lester       Roudabush,    Jr.,    seeks    to    appeal       the
    district court’s September 22, 2014 order granting his motion
    for voluntary dismissal of one defendant, denying his motions to
    recuse     and   expedite,       denying       his    motion    relating       to     the
    withdrawal of funds from his inmate account, dismissing another
    defendant, and requesting that the remaining defendants return
    waivers of service.            This court may exercise jurisdiction only
    over     final   orders,       
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
       (2012),       and    certain
    interlocutory and collateral orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
     (2012);
    Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
    
    337 U.S. 541
    ,    545-47    (1949).         The   order    Roudabush      seeks    to
    appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
    or collateral order.            Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
    lack of jurisdiction.               We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials     before    this    court     and    argument      would    not    aid    the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-7668

Citation Numbers: 590 F. App'x 249

Judges: Duncan, Diaz, Hamilton

Filed Date: 1/16/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024