Hurlbert v. Lloyd ( 2010 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6049
DONALD JAMES HURLBERT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
REGINALD I. LLOYD, Director SLED,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (9:09-cv-00241-PMD)
Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald James Hurlbert, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Todd
Hagins, SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Donald James Hurlbert appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hurlbert v. Lloyd, No. 9:09-cv-00241-PMD (D.S.C. Dec. 2,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2