Patrick Booker v. Scott Lewis ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 19-7687
    PATRICK L. BOOKER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    SCOTT LEWIS, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution; BART VINCENT,
    General Counsel for SCDC; JESSICA EDMOND, Mailroom Coordinator of SCDC;
    CATHERINE AMASON, Postal Director of Kershaw C.I.,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
    Charleston. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (2:17-cv-02165-DCC)
    Submitted: October 30, 2020                                 Decided: December 16, 2020
    Before KING, KEENAN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Patrick L. Booker, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Holmes Burton, GIBBES & BURTON,
    LLC, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Patrick L. Booker appeals from the district court’s order adopting the
    recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendants in
    his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     civil rights action and its order granting in part and denying in part
    his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. * We have reviewed the record
    and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court. Booker v. Lewis, No. 2:17-cv-02165-DCC (D.S.C. May 15 & Oct. 2, 2019).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    Booker’s timely appeal of the district court’s May 15, 2019, order—which
    dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted his claim for a violation of the First
    Amendment against Defendant Edmond, dismissed with prejudice his claim for a violation
    of the First Amendment against Defendant Amason, and granted Defendants’ summary
    judgment motion—and its October 2, 2019, order ruling on his timely Rule 59(e) motion
    affords this court jurisdiction over the appeal. See Affinity Living Grp., LLC v. StarStone
    Specialty Ins. Co., 
    959 F.3d 634
    , 639 (4th Cir. 2020); Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 
    959 F.3d 605
    , 611 (4th Cir. 2020); Campbell v. McCarthy, 
    952 F.3d 193
    , 202 n.7 (4th Cir. 2020),
    petition for cert. filed, No. 20-435 (U.S. Oct. 6, 2020).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-7687

Filed Date: 12/16/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/16/2020