Jane Doe v. James Dewees ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                   UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 20-1736
    JANE DOE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JAMES T. DEWEES, Sheriff of Carroll County; BEN CRAFT, Deputy Sheriff;
    DOUGLAS KRIETE, Deputy Sheriff; DAREN METZLER, Deputy Sheriff;
    MEGAN DICKERSON, Administrative Commissioner; MICHELE MINER, Court
    Commissioner; MARY C. REESE, District Court Judge; MARY K. SMITH, District
    Court Administrative Clerk; KATHRYN GLENN, District Court Clerk; C.
    HAINES, District Court Clerk; ADAM G. WELLS, Assistant State’s Attorney for
    Carroll County; GEORGE HARDINGER, Warden of Carroll County Detention
    Center (CCDC); AMANDA BLIZZARD, Correctional Officer; C.S. WENDELL
    HIGHSMITH, JR., Correctional Officer; CHESTER L. ARNOTT, Correctional
    Officer; CHEYENNE LEE, Correctional Officer; CRAIG KOERNER, Correctional
    Officer; DENNIS HARMON, Correctional Officer; GARTH MAYS, Correctional
    Officer; JOHN BOWEN, III, Correctional Officer; KENNETH CHESGREEN,
    Correctional Officer; KRISTY CERNY, Correctional Officer; KRISTY NAILL,
    Correctional Officer; MICHAEL ANDREWS, Correctional Officer; MICHAEL
    GREEN, Correctional Officer; MICHAEL L. MCCREA; JERSILD, Correctional
    Officer; PAULA HYDE, Correctional Officer; ROBIN L. SHORB, Correctional
    Officer; TONY L. MUMMERT, Correctional Officer; TRACY LILLEHAUG,
    Correctional Officer; JUDY WARNER, Correctional Officer; BRITNIE
    BOSCHERT, Employee of CCDC; JOYCE SCHAUM, Contractor with CONMED;
    CONMED        HEALTHCARE        MANAGEMENT;         SIX   UNIDENTIFIED
    CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS; UNIDENTIFIED CONTRACTOR, CONMED;
    JOANN ELLINGHAUS-JONES; NADIA MEDEVICH, Correctional Officer;
    BRIAN DELEONARDO, State’s Attorney for Carroll County; MICHAEL E.
    BOYD; TERESA L. BOSLEY, Correctional Officer; FIVE UNIDENTIFIED
    DISTRICT COURT CLERKS; JOSHUA BOSCHERT, Correctional Officer;
    BRENDA S. STOREY, District Court Clerk; CATHY A. HAINES, District Court
    Clerk; E. M. ARNOLD, District Court Clerk; FRANCES A. BYAN, District Court
    Clerk; REBECCA L. ELLIGSON, District Court Clerk; JOHN F. GLORIOSO,
    District Court Clerk; TRACEY L. LEISTER, District Court Clerk; JENNIFER A.
    LEVEE, District Court Clerk; NELLIE M. LONG, District Court Clerk; FRANCES
    M. NOEL; CYNTHIA M. SIZEMORE, District Court Clerk; JOHNNA L. STEED,
    District Court Clerk; JAMES CERNY, Correctional Officer; LONNIE J. JERSILD,
    Correctional Officer; WESLEY L. DAVIS, Correctional Officer; ASHLEY
    MORRELL, Correctional Officer; A. PARKS, Correctional Officer; ROBERT E.
    SMITH, Correctional Officer; ROCHELLE HERMAN, contractor with CONMED;
    WADE BOLNER; CATHERINE PILO,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:18-cv-02014-TDC)
    Submitted: December 22, 2020                                Decided: December 28, 2020
    Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jane Doe, Appellant Pro Se. Jason L. Levine, LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSURANCE
    TRUST, Hanover, Maryland; Alexandra Renee Hilton, Megan Trocki Mantzavinos,
    MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Jane Doe seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing some, but not all, of
    the Defendants and claims in Doe’s civil rights action. This court may exercise jurisdiction
    only over final orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
    
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
    ; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949). The orders Doe seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable
    interlocutory or collateral orders.   Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
    jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-1736

Filed Date: 12/28/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/28/2020