Littlejohn v. Qaddifi ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 10-1603
    QUINTIN LITTLEJOHN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MUMMAR AL QADDIFI, leader of Libya, North Africa,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Spartanburg.     R. Bryan Harwell, District
    Judge. (7:10-cv-01122-RBH)
    Submitted:   July 27, 2010                 Decided:   August 5, 2010
    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit
    Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Quintin Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Quintin        Littlejohn         seeks       to    appeal          the       district
    court’s order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice.
    The    district    court       referred      this   case       to    a    magistrate           judge
    pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C.A. § 636
    (b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp. 2010).
    The    magistrate       judge       recommended     that       relief         be    denied          and
    advised    Littlejohn           that    failure       to       file        specific            timely
    objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review
    of a district court order based upon the recommendation.
    The        timely       filing     of     specific           objections            to     a
    magistrate       judge’s       recommendation         is       necessary           to     preserve
    appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when
    the     parties        have     been      warned       of      the        consequences               of
    noncompliance.          Wright v. Collins, 
    766 F.2d 841
    , 845-46 (4th
    Cir.    1985);    see     also       Thomas v.      Arn,       
    474 U.S. 140
         (1985).
    Littlejohn       has    waived       appellate      review        by     failing          to    file
    specific objections after receiving proper notice.                                 Accordingly,
    we dismiss the appeal.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions          are   adequately      presented            in     the      materials
    before    the    court     and      argument      would     not      aid      the       decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-1603

Judges: Traxler, Wilkinson, Keenan

Filed Date: 8/5/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024