Vernon Dowling v. United States ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 19-7273
    VERNON BRENT DOWLING,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; FBOP
    DIRECTOR SAMUELS; ALL FEDERAL EMPLOYEES RESPONSIBLE FOR
    NEGLIGENCE,   INJURY,   AND     DAMAGES         AND      HEALTH
    SERVICES/CORPORATE CONTRACT, (full names are unknown at this time);
    OFFICER WALKER; OFFICER PLATTS; LT. MERRILL; WARDEN A.
    MANSUKHANI; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; FBOP;
    DIRECTORS   SAMUELS, (FBOP); FEDERAL EMPLOYEES; HEALTH
    SERVICES; WARDEN MANSUKHANI; MS. WILLIAMS,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
    Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (0:16-cv-03468-DCN)
    Submitted: December 10, 2020                                  Decided: January 5, 2021
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Vernon Brent Dowling, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Vernon B. Dowling appeals the district court’s orders accepting the
    recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his claims pursuant to the Federal
    Tort Claims Act, 
    28 U.S.C. §§ 1346
    (b), 2671-2680, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction,
    and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dowling v. United
    States, No. 0:16-cv-03468-DCN (D.S.C. Oct. 24, 2018 & June 18, 2019). We also deny
    Dowling’s pending motions to appoint counsel, to seal a motion for appointment of
    counsel, for a transcript at government expense, to stay the appeal, to provide the
    Defendants’ insurance information, and to withdraw his consent to proceed under the
    Prison Litigation Reform Act. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-7273

Filed Date: 1/5/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/5/2021