United States v. Monquay Williams ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-6711
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MONQUAY WILLIAMS, a/k/a Quay,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
    District Judge. (4:10-cr-00047-RBS-TEM-5)
    Submitted:   July 21, 2015                 Decided:   July 24, 2015
    Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Monquay Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II,
    Eric Matthew Hurt, Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States
    Attorneys, Valerie S. Muth, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
    Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Monquay Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order
    granting the Government’s motion to reduce his sentence.                Under 18
    U.S.C. § 3742(a) (2012), we “lack jurisdiction to review the extent
    of the district court’s downward departure.”               United States v.
    Hill, 
    70 F.3d 321
    , 324 (4th Cir. 1995); see United States v. Davis,
    
    679 F.3d 190
    , 193-94 (4th Cir. 2012) (explaining that, although
    the court may entertain “challenges to the lawfulness of the method
    used by the district court in making its sentencing decision,”
    this    court     lacks   “jurisdiction     to   review    any     part   of   a
    discretionary      sentencing    decision”).     Because     the   sole    issue
    raised on appeal attacks the extent of the reduction awarded by
    the    district    court,   we    dismiss    this   appeal       for   lack    of
    jurisdiction.      We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-6711

Judges: Wilkinson, Motz, Davis

Filed Date: 7/24/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024