In Re: Julius Nesbitt v. ( 2016 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1190
In Re: JULIUS NESBITT,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(2:08-cr-01153-DCN-1; 2:14-cv-04503-DCN)
Submitted: August 1, 2016 Decided: August 22, 2016
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julius Nesbitt, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Julius Nesbitt petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act. Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the district court recently took
significant action on Nesbitt’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2