United States v. Tavon McPhaul ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-4172
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    TAVON MCPHAUL, a/k/a Block,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.     Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District
    Judge. (1:12-cr-00616-MJG-3)
    Submitted:   November 7, 2014               Decided:   November 20, 2014
    Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Beth M. Farber, HARRIS O’BRIEN, New York, New York, for
    Appellant.   Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Benjamin
    M. Block, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore,
    Maryland, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Tavon   McPhaul    seeks     to     appeal     his    conviction         and
    sentence.        The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal as
    untimely.       In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice
    of    appeal    within    fourteen   days      after    the   entry       of    judgment.
    Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A).               With or without a motion, upon a
    showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court
    may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of
    appeal.        Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 
    759 F.2d 351
    , 353 (4th Cir. 1985).
    The   district    court    entered      judgment      on    January      13,
    2014.     McPhaul filed the notice of appeal on February 26, 2014,
    after the fourteen-day period expired but within the thirty-day
    excusable       neglect   period.        Because    the     notice    of       appeal   was
    filed within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case to
    the district court for the court to determine whether McPhaul
    has     shown    excusable      neglect     or     good     cause     warranting         an
    extension of the fourteen-day appeal period.                         The record, as
    supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further
    consideration.         We defer action on the Government’s motion to
    dismiss the appeal.
    REMANDED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-4172

Judges: Wynn, Diaz, Davis

Filed Date: 11/20/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024