United States v. Cornelius Smith ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 11-4043
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CORNELIUS KEITH SMITH,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan,
    Chief District Judge. (7:10-cr-00076-FL-1)
    Submitted:   September 29, 2011           Decided:   October 18, 2011
    Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by unpublished
    per curiam opinion.
    J. Merritt Wagoner, SULLIVAN & WAGONER LLP, Wilmington, North
    Carolina, for Appellant.     Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Cornelius        Keith     Smith         appeals       his    sentence    of       327
    months’ imprisonment for possession with intent to distribute
    cocaine in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (a)(1) (2006) and use and
    carry of a firearm during and in relation to, and possession in
    furtherance     of,     a     drug   trafficking            crime    in    violation       of    
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (c)(1) (2006).
    Currently          pending          before        this        court      is        the
    Government’s         motion    to    vacate          Smith’s      sentence     in    light       of
    United    States      v.    Simmons,       
    649 F.3d 237
         (4th    Cir.     2011)      (en
    banc),    and    to     remand       the    case       to    the     district       court       for
    resentencing.          Smith requests that we grant the Government’s
    motion.    We grant the motion.              Smith brought no challenge to his
    conviction      in    his     opening      brief.           Accordingly,       the    district
    court’s judgment is affirmed as to the conviction, vacated as to
    the sentence, and the case is remanded for resentencing.
    AFFIRMED IN PART,
    VACATED IN PART,
    AND REMANDED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-4043

Filed Date: 10/18/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021