Tony Smith v. Harold Clarke ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 20-6111
    TONY BRYAN SMITH,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    HAROLD CLARKE,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-00191-TSE-IDD)
    Submitted: September 10, 2020                               Decided: September 23, 2020
    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Tony Bryan Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Tony Bryan Smith, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying his
    Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6) motion to reopen the expired appeal period for appealing the denial
    of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the court’s judgment. * On appeal, we
    confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because
    Smith’s informal brief does not challenge the district court’s denial of his Rule 4(a)(6)
    motion, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 
    775 F.3d 170
    , 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth
    Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we
    affirm the district court’s order denying Smith’s Rule 4(a)(6) motion. We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    To the extent Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying the
    underlying Rule 59(e) motion—entered on the docket on October 18, 2019—we lack
    jurisdiction to consider that order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) (setting 30-day appeal
    period for civil actions in which the United States is not a party); Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007) (“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a
    jurisdictional requirement.”).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-6111

Filed Date: 9/23/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 9/23/2020