Henry Steele v. Donald Mobley ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 16-7209
    HENRY J. STEELE,
    Plaintiff – Appellant,
    v.
    DONALD MOBLEY; CLARENCE      LEE    FAULCON;     PETER   B.   WOGLOM;
    CAROLINE TAYLOR,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (5:14-ct-03298-F)
    Submitted:   November 17, 2016             Decided:      November 22, 2016
    Before GREGORY,    Chief   Judge,   and   MOTZ    and    TRAXLER,   Circuit
    Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Henry J. Steele, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special
    Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; John W.
    Holton, John Walton Minier, YATES, MCLAMB & WEYHER, LLP,
    Raleigh, North Carolina; Kelly Street Brown, Elizabeth Pharr
    McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Henry J. Steele seeks to appeal the district court’s order
    dismissing two named defendants in his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2012)
    action.    This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
    orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
     (2012), and certain interlocutory and
    collateral    orders,       
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
       (2012);     Fed.     R.    Civ.   P.
    54(b); Cohen        v.    Beneficial   Indus.    Loan     Corp.,    
    337 U.S. 541
    ,
    545-46 (1949).           The order Steele seeks to appeal is neither a
    final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.                           We
    dispense     with        oral    argument    because      the    facts     and    legal
    contentions    are       adequately    presented     in    the   materials        before
    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-7209

Filed Date: 11/22/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021