Larry Tyler v. Captain Coe , 671 F. App'x 53 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                 UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 16-6807
    LARRY JAMES TYLER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CAPTAIN COE; WAYNE BYRD; DIANN WILKS,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Beaufort.    Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
    (9:16-cv-00122-MGL)
    Submitted:   November 22, 2016                Decided:    November 28, 2016
    Before DIAZ and      THACKER,    Circuit   Judges,       and   DAVIS,   Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Larry James Tyler, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Larry    James     Tyler    appeals       the    district       court’s   order
    dismissing his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2012) complaint.                      The district
    court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (b)(1)(B) (2012).            The magistrate judge recommended
    that Tyler’s action be dismissed because he failed to comply
    with the court’s February 24, 2016, order instructing him that
    he had 21 days to fill out certain forms and provide information
    to the court needed to proceed with his action.                      The magistrate
    judge’s    order     advised     Tyler    that       failure    to     file    timely
    objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review
    of a district court order based upon the recommendation.
    The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
    judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
    of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
    been warned of the consequences of noncompliance.                        Wright v.
    Collins, 
    766 F.2d 841
    , 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas
    v. Arn, 
    474 U.S. 140
     (1985).             Tyler has waived appellate review
    by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.
    Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
    We    deny     Tyler’s    motion    for   appointment       of    counsel   and
    dispense     with    oral     argument    because      the     facts    and    legal
    2
    contentions   are   adequately   presented   in   the   materials   before
    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-6807

Citation Numbers: 671 F. App'x 53

Judges: Diaz, Thacker, Davis

Filed Date: 11/28/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024