United States v. Clarence Coakley ( 2016 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7165
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLARENCE D. COAKLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (4:96-cr-00026-BO-1)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam.
Clarence D. Coakley, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant
United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence D. Coakley appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d
183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010) (“[A] defendant who was convicted of a
crack offense but sentenced pursuant to a mandatory statutory
minimum sentence is ineligible for a reduction under
§ 3582(c)(2).”). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2