United States v. Vincent White ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 20-6261
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    VINCENT DONTA WHITE,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
    Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:16-cr-00026-CCE-1; 1:17-cv-01082-
    CCE-JLW)
    Submitted: September 24, 2020                               Decided: September 28, 2020
    Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Vincent Donta White, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Vincent Donta White seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the
    magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     motion to vacate.
    We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely
    filed.
    When the United States or its officer or agency is a party in a civil case, the notice
    of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final
    judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal
    period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P.
    4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
    requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007).
    The district court entered its order on December 3, 2019. White filed the notice of
    appeal on February 4, 2020. * Because White failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to
    obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny White’s motion for a
    certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    *
    For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of
    appeal is the earliest date White could have delivered the notice to prison officials for
    mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 
    487 U.S. 266
    , 276 (1988).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-6261

Filed Date: 9/28/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 9/28/2020