Tyrell Johnson v. Harold Clarke ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 20-6843
    TYRELL L. JOHNSON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    HAROLD W. CLARKE,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:20-cv-00172-JAG-RCY)
    Submitted: October 2, 2020                                        Decided: October 8, 2020
    Before KING, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Tyrell L. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Tyrell L. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.
    § 2254 petition as successive. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the
    notice of appeal was not timely filed.
    In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final
    judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court
    extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under
    Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a
    jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007).
    The district court entered its order on March 27, 2020; and the notice of appeal had
    to be filed by Monday, April 27, 2020. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(1)(C). Johnson filed the
    notice of appeal on April 28, 2020. * Because Johnson failed to file a timely notice of
    appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    *
    For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of
    appeal is the earliest date Johnson could have delivered the notice to prison officials for
    mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 
    487 U.S. 266
    , 276 (1988).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-6843

Filed Date: 10/8/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/8/2020