United States v. Dias ( 2010 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6637
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
STEVE DIAS, a/k/a Troy, a/k/a O’Neil Guthrie,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 9, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steve Dias, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United
States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steve Dias appeals the district court’s order denying
his second 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of
sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Dias, No.
3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 2010); see also United
States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234-46 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding
that district court lacked authority to grant defendant’s motion
to reconsider, filed eight months after the district court’s
order ruling on original § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2