United States v. Christopher Beebe , 675 F. App'x 378 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-4770
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CHRISTOPHER BRIT BEEBE,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.     Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
    District Judge. (3:15-cr-00194-CMC-1)
    Submitted:   January 31, 2017             Decided:   February 7, 2017
    Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Nicole Nicolette Mace, THE MACE FIRM, Myrtle Beach, South
    Carolina, for Appellant.     William N. Nettles, United States
    Attorney, Robert F. Daley, Jr., William E. Day, II, Assistant
    United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Christopher Brit Beebe seeks to appeal his conviction and
    97-month     sentence       for    conspiracy         to   distribute      controlled
    substances, 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 846
    , 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(E) (2012), and
    possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking
    crime, 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (c)(1)(A)(i) (2012).                     In its brief, the
    Government argues that the appeal should be dismissed as barred
    by Beebe’s waiver of the right to appeal included in the plea
    agreement.      Upon review of the plea agreement and the transcript
    of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, we conclude that Beebe
    knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and that
    the issues Beebe seeks to raise on appeal fall squarely within
    the   compass    of   his    waiver      of       appellate   rights.      We    reject
    Beebe’s    assertion        that    the       Government      breached     the     plea
    agreement.      Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.                      We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately    presented      in    the    materials        before   this   court    and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-4770

Citation Numbers: 675 F. App'x 378

Judges: Duncan, Keenan, Per Curiam, Wynn

Filed Date: 2/7/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024