Mattie Wilson v. South Carolina Telco Federal ( 2021 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1999
MATTIE SARAH ELIZABETH WILSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA TELCO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION BANK; CHAD
OLIVER; TERESA VALAYE; SYVANNA; KATE PATTERSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Jacquelyn Denise Austin, Magistrate Judge. (6:20-cv-02087-MGL)
Submitted: February 18, 2021 Decided: February 22, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mattie Sarah Elizabeth Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mattie Sarah Elizabeth Wilson seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s report
recommending that the district court dismiss Wilson’s complaint for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction or, alternatively, for failure to state a claim. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Wilson seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2