Elnora Delcid v. Valor Apartment ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • USCA4 Appeal: 22-2053      Doc: 11         Filed: 03/20/2023    Pg: 1 of 2
    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 22-2053
    ELNORA DELCID,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    VALOR APARTMENT; JUANA LOZANO, Community Mgt.; MARIE WHITE,
    Community Mgt; GABY FERNANDEZ, Leasing Consultant; FINNESSA RANDALL,
    Leasing Consultant; PEDRO RAMOS, Maintenance Man; HERMAN BANKS,
    Maintenance Man; RYANN PITTINGER, Maintenance Man,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:21-cv-00783-DJN)
    Submitted: March 16, 2023                                         Decided: March 20, 2023
    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Elnora Delcid, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    USCA4 Appeal: 22-2053         Doc: 11      Filed: 03/20/2023     Pg: 2 of 2
    PER CURIAM:
    Elnora Delcid seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her civil rights
    action for failure to prosecute. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the
    notice of appeal was not timely filed.
    In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final
    judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court
    extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under
    Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a
    jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007).
    The district court entered its order on February 17, 2022. Delcid filed the notice of
    appeal on September 27, 2022. Because Delcid failed to file a timely notice of appeal or
    to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-2053

Filed Date: 3/20/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/21/2023