United States v. Hakim Rashid ( 2021 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7038
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HAKIM ABDULAH RASHID, a/k/a Rodney Buchanan,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (4:10-cr-00941-RBH-1)
Submitted: February 19, 2021 Decided: February 25, 2021
Before KING, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hakim Abdulah Rashid, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Hakim Abdulah Rashid appeals the district court’s order denying, without
prejudice, * Rashid’s motion for compassionate release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391,
§ 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
See United States v. Rashid, No. 4:10-cr-00941-RBH-1 (D.S.C. June 26, 2020). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
*
Although the district court denied the motion without prejudice, we have
jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 615 (4th Cir.
2020).
2