Olander Bynum v. Timothy Spencer ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                      UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 20-7239
    OLANDER R. BYNUM,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    TIMOTHY K. SPENCER,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
    Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03322-FL)
    Submitted: February 23, 2021                                  Decided: February 26, 2021
    Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Olander R. Bynum, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Olander R. Bynum appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
    action as duplicative and, therefore, frivolous, pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (e). On appeal,
    we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
    Because Bynum’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s
    disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey,
    
    775 F.3d 170
    , 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under
    Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly,
    we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-7239

Filed Date: 2/26/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/26/2021