Thomas Labuwi, II v. Eric Bradley ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • USCA4 Appeal: 22-6678      Doc: 9         Filed: 03/21/2023    Pg: 1 of 2
    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 22-6678
    THOMAS WALKER LABUWI, II,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    ERIC BRADLEY, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
    Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:21-hc-02210-FL)
    Submitted: March 16, 2023                                         Decided: March 21, 2023
    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
    Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Thomas Walker Labuwi, II, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    USCA4 Appeal: 22-6678      Doc: 9          Filed: 03/21/2023    Pg: 2 of 2
    PER CURIAM:
    Thomas Walker Labuwi, II—a federal prisoner who was convicted and sentenced
    in the Eastern District of North Carolina but who is presently incarcerated in the Northern
    District of West Virginia—filed a 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
     petition in the North Carolina district
    court, which the court denied. A district court may only grant habeas relief within its
    jurisdiction. See 
    28 U.S.C. §§ 2241
    (a), 2242; Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 
    542 U.S. 426
    , 442-43
    (2004).   Because Labuwi is incarcerated in the Northern District of West Virginia,
    jurisdiction over his § 2241 petition lies in that district—not in the district court below.
    See Padilla, 
    542 U.S. at 442-44
    .
    Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order and remand for the district court to
    determine whether transferring Labuwi’s § 2241 petition would serve the interest of justice,
    see 
    28 U.S.C. §§ 1406
    (a), 1631, or whether the petition is more appropriately dismissed
    without prejudice to refiling in the appropriate district court. We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    VACATED AND REMANDED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-6678

Filed Date: 3/21/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/22/2023