Marcos Santiago v. United States ( 2023 )

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6416 Doc: 45 Filed: 03/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6416
MARCOS F. SANTIAGO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee.
No. 22-6580
MARCOS F. SANTIAGO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:21-cv-00436-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: March 21, 2023 Decided: March 23, 2023
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6416 Doc: 45 Filed: 03/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcos F. Santiago, Appellant Pro Se. Krista Consiglio Frith, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNTED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6416 Doc: 45 Filed: 03/23/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Marcos F. Santiago appeals the district court’s orders dismissing for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction his civil action seeking relief under the Federal Tort Claims Act,
28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to reconsider.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s orders. Santiago v. United States, No. 7:21-cv-00436-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va.
Mar. 14, 2022 & Mar. 28, 2022). We deny Santiago’s motions for appointment of counsel,
to compel or direct the United States to respond, and for consideration of new evidence.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3