United States v. Gregory Anderson ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • USCA4 Appeal: 22-7300      Doc: 6         Filed: 03/24/2023    Pg: 1 of 2
    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 22-7300
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    GREGORY D. ANDERSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
    Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:10-cr-00260-MOC-DSC-1)
    Submitted: March 21, 2023                                         Decided: March 24, 2023
    Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Gregory D. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    USCA4 Appeal: 22-7300         Doc: 6     Filed: 03/24/2023     Pg: 2 of 2
    PER CURIAM:
    Gregory D. Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
    compassionate release pursuant to 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step
    Act of 2018, 
    Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132
     Stat. 5194. While this appeal was pending,
    Anderson was released from custody.         Therefore, his appeal as it relates to the
    circumstances presented by the COVID-19 pandemic is now moot. See United States v.
    Shorter, 
    27 F.4th 572
    , 575-76 (7th Cir. 2022). And while we have jurisdiction over the
    remainder of the appeal because Anderson requested that the district court terminate his
    supervised release, see United States v. Chestnut, 
    989 F.3d 222
    , 225 (2d Cir. 2021), a
    movant may not challenge the validity of his underlying convictions or sentence in a
    compassionate release motion, see United States v. Ferguson, 
    55 F.4th 262
    , 270-72 (4th
    Cir. 2022). Therefore, we dismiss this appeal in part and affirm the district court’s order
    in part. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED IN PART,
    AFFIRMED IN PART
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-7300

Filed Date: 3/24/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/25/2023