Short v. Hoke ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 10-6922
    HARVEY P. SHORT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    ADRIAN HOKE, Warden,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Charleston.    David A. Faber,
    Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-01097)
    Submitted:   November 30, 2010            Decided:   December 7, 2010
    Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Harvey P. Short, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Harvey P. Short seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying
    relief without prejudice on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2006) petition
    for failure to exhaust state court remedies.                               The order is not
    appealable       unless        a   circuit          justice         or     judge       issues     a
    certificate         of     appealability.             See     
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1)
    (2006).     A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a
    substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
    
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2) (2006).                      When the district court denies
    relief    on    the      merits,   a     prisoner      satisfies           this      standard    by
    demonstrating         that     reasonable           jurists     would          find    that     the
    district       court’s      assessment      of      the     constitutional             claims    is
    debatable      or     wrong.       Slack    v.       McDaniel,           
    529 U.S. 473
    ,    484
    (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003).
    When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the
    prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural
    ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable
    claim of the denial of a constitutional right.                                 Slack, 
    529 U.S. at 484-85
    .         We    have   independently            reviewed           the    record    and
    conclude       that      Short     has    not       made      the        requisite      showing.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss
    the   appeal.         Short’s      motion    to      compel        the    Circuit       Court    of
    Kanawha County to adjudicate his state habeas corpus petition is
    2
    denied.     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions    are   adequately   presented    in   the    materials
    before    the   court   and   argument   would   not   aid   the   decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-6922

Filed Date: 12/7/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021