Herrera v. Gee ( 1997 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7822
PETER P. HERRERA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ARCHIE GEE, Warden; J. HENNEBERRY, Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96-
702-AMD)
Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 4, 1997
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter P. Herrera, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., At-
torney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney
General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Herrera v. Gee, No. CA-96-702-AMD (D. Md. Oct. 23, 1996). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2