Joel Vicars v. Harold Clarke ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-7546
    JOEL VICARS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of
    Corrections (VDOC); A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections
    Operations of the VDOC; JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of
    Operations      of    the    VDOC;     GREGORY    HOLLOWAY,
    Superintendent/Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison; DAVID
    ZOOK, Assistant Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison;
    REBECCA YOUNG, Operations Manager/Officer at Wallens Ridge
    State Prison; W. TODD FARRIS, Unit Manager at Wallens Ridge
    State Prison; DENNIS COLLINS, Unit Manager at Wallens Ridge
    State Prison; QUINCEY REYNOLDS, Unit Manager of the 864.1
    VHU   at   Wallens  Ridge State   Prison;  BRENDA  RAVIZEE,
    Institutional Ombudsman/Grievance Coordinator at Wallens
    Ridge State Prison,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.       Norman K. Moon, Senior
    District Judge. (7:15-cv-00620-NKM-RSB)
    Submitted:   May 13, 2016                     Decided:   June 3, 2016
    Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Joel Vicars, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant
    Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Joel   Vicars    appeals   the   district    court’s       order   granting
    summary judgment to the Defendants on his complaint asserting
    claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and the Religious Land Use
    and   Institutionalized      Persons       Act,   42    U.S.C.    §§ 2000cc     to
    2000cc-5     (2012).    We   have   reviewed      the   record     and   find   no
    reversible error.      Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
    by the district court.       Vicars v. Clarke, No. 7:14-cv-00620-NKM-
    RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2015).              We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-7546

Filed Date: 6/3/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021