Yolanda Bell v. Anne Heishman , 699 F. App'x 185 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 17-1606
    YOLANDA BELL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    ANNE M. HEISHMAN; KENNETH LABOWITZ; SABEN JOHNSTON, Esquire;
    BLANKENSHIP & KEITH; INOVA HEALTH CARE, d/b/a INOVA Fairfax Hospital;
    BEVERLY ENTERPRISES VIRGINIA, INC., d/b/a Golden Living Centers-Sleepy
    Hollow,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00430-AJT-TCB)
    Submitted: October 17, 2017                                   Decided: October 19, 2017
    Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Yolanda Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Edward Labowitz, DINGMAN LABOWITZ,
    PC, Alexandria, Virginia; Mark Sheridan Brennan, Ashley Goin Moss,
    VANDEVENTER BLACK, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Yolanda Bell seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying her motion for a
    temporary restraining order and her motions for reconsideration. This court may exercise
    jurisdiction only over final orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
     (2012), and certain interlocutory and
    collateral orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
     (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
    Indus. Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949). The orders Bell seeks to appeal are
    neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.      Accordingly,
    although we grant Bell’s motion to expedite, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis
    and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-1606

Citation Numbers: 699 F. App'x 185

Judges: Floyd, Hamilton, Harris, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 10/19/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024