Charles Tunstall v. Frank Perry , 707 F. App'x 203 ( 2017 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7023
CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FRANK L. PERRY; BEVERLY STUBBS, R.N.; DR. ARTHUR DAVIS;
CLINTON BROCKINGTON; DR. SAMI HUSSAN; JANE WELCH; DR.
DONALD MICKLOS; LYNDA PADGETT; LITITIA OWENS; LEQUECIA
FALCON; PAULA Y. SMITH; MS. CARMEN S. HENDRICKS; DR. KEYSER;
PETER WOGLAM,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01434-LCB-JEP)
Submitted: December 21, 2017 Decided: December 28, 2017
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Alonzo Tunstall appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Tunstall’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tunstall v.
Perry, No. 1:16-cv-01434-LCB-JEP (M.D.N.C. July 25, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2